Nellie Taraba Wallberg vs Ines Faltinger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Nov at 06:17 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Taraba Wallberg vs I. Faltinger

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUT
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Wallberg 1 - 0 Faltinger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nellie Taraba Wallberg winning 2 and Ines Faltinger winning 0. The last match between Nellie Taraba Wallberg and Ines Faltinger was at the W15 Monastir, 19-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nellie Taraba Wallberg getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wallberg | 1 |
| Faltinger | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Monastir(11-19-25)
N. T. Wallberg vs I. Faltinger H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.26% (32-22) | Career Total W/L | 43.55% (54-70) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. T. Wallberg vs I. Faltinger Match Preview:
- Nellie Taraba Wallberg excels on her second serve, winning 38.80% of points, compared to Ines Faltinger's 30.77%. Could this give Wallberg an edge in maintaining serve?
- While Faltinger outshines Wallberg slightly in return games, winning 57.14% of opponent's second serve points versus Wallberg's 54.15%, does this suggest a tactical advantage in breaking serve?
- Wallberg proves more resilient under pressure, saving 46.50% of breakpoints, in comparison to Faltinger's 36.36%. Could this resilience play a decisive role during crucial moments?
- Overall performance over the past year shows Wallberg with a 58.33% win rate, while Faltinger has achieved a 50% win rate. Does Wallberg's superior consistency indicate a tendency to win more matches?
- Both players perform best on hard surfaces, with Wallberg having a slight edge on indoor hard courts. However, Faltinger has yet to win on indoor hard courts. Could surface preference influence the outcome?
- Wallberg competes mainly at higher-level events, boasting a 64.29% win rate, whereas Faltinger participates in lower-tier tournaments with a 57.14% success rate. How might the level of competition affect their head-to-head match-up?
- Faltinger has faced opponents with a higher average ranking than Wallberg. Could this experience against tougher opponents give Faltinger an unexpected advantage?
- If this encounter extends to a deciding set, Wallberg has a strong track record, winning 71% of such scenarios, overshadowing Faltinger's 33% success rate. How significant is this stat in predicting match closure?
- Wallberg has a breakpoint conversion rate of 43.00%, while Faltinger's perfect 100.00% might be misleading given the number of opportunities. Will break opportunities decisively tip the scales in favor of either player?
Editorial Prediction (November 19, 2025, UTC):
As we evaluate the upcoming match between Nellie Taraba Wallberg and Ines Faltinger, Wallberg’s superior performance on second serves and resilience under pressure stand out as potentially crucial elements. With a higher save rate on breakpoints and a stronger overall winning percentage, Wallberg shows consistent competitiveness on court.
Although Faltinger demonstrates a superior return game, particularly against high-ranking opponents, her exposure to tougher competition might not compensate for Wallberg’s tactical strengths. Wallberg’s preference for indoor hard courts should also strengthen her position, especially against Faltinger’s struggles on this surface.
If the match stretches to a deciding set, Wallberg's impressive record in such scenarios suggests an ability to maintain composure and close out victories. This, combined with her breakpoint conversion capacity, presents a formidable challenge for Faltinger.
Factoring in these considerations, Nellie Taraba Wallberg emerges as the likely winner for this upcoming tennis match, as her advantages across several key areas may provide the edge needed for victory.
Nellie Taraba Wallberg vs Ines Faltinger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. T. Wallberg vs I. Faltinger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 0:51:11 | Average Match Time | 0:51:11 |
| 49% (18/37) | 1st Serve % | 54% (21/39) |
| 89% (16/18) | 1st Serve Win % | 33% (7/21) |
| 53% (10/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (5/18) |
| 86% (6/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 69% (27/39) | Return Points Win % | 30% (11/37) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. T. Wallberg Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F | W | 6-0 6-4 | ||
SF | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
QF | W | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-0 | ||
I. Faltinger Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-1 6-0 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||

N. T. Wallberg vs I. Faltinger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.26% (32/22) | YTD Win/Loss | 43.55% (54/70) |
| 56.00% (70/55) | Sets Win/Loss | 44.07% (119/151) |
| 52.56% (616/556) | Games Win/Loss | 47.04% (1138/1281) |
| 100.00% (5/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 45.45% (5/6) |
| 54.05% (20/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 43.75% (49/63) |
| 58.33% (7/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 81 | Aces Total | 15 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 153 | Total Double Faults | 247 |
| 1:27:4 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 313.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 313.71 |
| 60% (1956/3243) | 1st Serve % | 66% (2221/3365) |
| 59% (1162/1956) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (1085/2221) |
| 44% (568/1287) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (441/1144) |
| 55% (218/396) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (217/425) |
| 48% (1472/3037) | Return Points Win % | 47% (1591/3380) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.17% (16/13) | Challenger W/L | 32.00% (8/17) |
| 69.57% (16/7) | Futures W/L | 46.46% (46/53) |
| 60% (32/53) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (52/121) |
| 42% (5/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (9/14) |
| 67% (12/18) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (12/25) |
| 92% (25/23) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (55/47) |
| 8% (25/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (55/7) |
| 31% (29/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (69/6) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Matteo Berrettini vs Pablo Carreno-Busta Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, F, ITA – 23rd November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Jaume Antoni Munar Clar Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, F, ITA – 23rd November 2025 Best Bets

Leolia Jeanjean vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
